Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?

To: "David Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?
Cc: csnook@xxxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:04:28 +0200
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:37:33 -0400
>> Julius Volz wrote:
>> > Since IPVS now does partial IPv6, should we finally move it from
>> > "net/ipv4/ipvs" to "net" or to "net/netfilter"? I posted that patch a
>> > long time ago, but that was before any of the actual v6 features, so
>> > there was probably no interest.
>> Whatever the netfilter people want is fine with me.
> I think, especially in the long term, putting IPVS under net/netfilter/
> is the right thing to do.

Ok thanks, I'll send the patch for that once lvs-next-2.6 or
net-next-2.6 builds for ARCH=um again (there seems to be some breakage
at the moment)...


Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>