|
On Saturday, October 30, 2010 12:59:34 Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > I realise that the commenting syntax used throughout IPVS
> > is a) inconsistent and b) for the most part does not comply with
> > any variant of the style guidelines. However, for the record
> > I believe that the preferred commenting style for code in net/
> > and thus IPVS is:
> >
> > /* This is a one line comment */
> >
> > /* This is a
> > * multi-line comment
> > */
>
> Documentation/CodingStyle has rule for multi-line:
>
> /*
> * This is a
> * multi-line comment
> */
>
> >> + ip_vs_conn_fill_param(af, sc->v6.protocol,
> >> + (const union nf_inet_addr *)&sc->v6.caddr,
> >> + sc->v6.cport,
> >> + (const union nf_inet_addr *)&sc->v6.vaddr,
> >> + sc->v6.vport, p);
> >
> > I'm ok with not aligning to the opening ( in order to avoid
> > going over 80 columns here. Though I suspect others would disagree.
>
> Agreed, in such cases I prefer one tab after parent,
> especially, if there is no other code around and when not
> part of some complex 'if' expression.
>
> I'm now sure Hans will read Documentation/CodingStyle again :)
>
I will have it as my night reading ;-)
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
