|
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:16:02 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:55:32PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
[ snip ]
> >
> > Simon should tell what happens if some PE updates
> > ct->pe_data, may be we should replace it too for the
> > case when ip_vs_proc_conn works with existing template?
>
> At this stage there is no facility for updating PE data.
> But I think replacing it should be fine, so long as
> the appropriate locking is in place.
Julian,
I can't see where this could happen,
but I might be out of sync :-)
IF this an issue that we must take care of,
(Then I'm a little bit lost)
could you please explain it for me or pass a code example of how to do it.
ENDIF
--
Regards
Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
