|
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 01:17:39 Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>
> >> As for ip_vs_sync_conn_options
> >> there is no app in mainline kernel 2.6.36+ that will trigger
> >> this parameter. And we do not know (yet) how to sync SEQs with
> >> Netfilter in the case for ip_vs_ftp.
> >
> > If we receive packets with ip_vs_sync_conn_options what shoud be done
> > - dropt that single conn msg ? (My vote)
> > or
> > - ignore ip_vs_sync_conn_options and try to process the message ?
> >
> > I leave the "dead code" in case it's needed later on.
> > (except for Version 1 receive)
>
> Why? Just copy data to cp->in_seq and cp->out_seq
> as before but for version 1 make sure the values in
> struct ip_vs_seq are sent in network order. If some APP
> provides diff != 0 these SEQs will be sent.
>
OK, I'll do that
--
Regards
Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
