LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [RFC v2] ipvs: allow transmit of GRO aggregated skbs

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] ipvs: allow transmit of GRO aggregated skbs
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:31:51 +0900
[ CCing Herbet Xu ]

On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:28:21PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 04:18:21PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> >     Hello,
> > 
> > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
> > 
> > >This is a first attempt at allowing LVS to transmit
> > >skbs of greater than MTU length that have been aggregated by GRO.
> > >
> > >I have lightly tested the ip_vs_dr_xmit() portion of this patch and
> > >although it seems to work I am unsure that netif_needs_gso() is the correct
> > >test to use.
> > 
> >     ip_forward() uses !skb_is_gso(skb), so may be it is
> > enough to check for GRO instead of using netif_needs_gso?
> 
> Thanks, I'll look into that.

Hi Julian,

just to clarify, you think that !skb_is_gso(skb) should be
used in ip_vs_xmit.c? If so, yes I think that makes sense
and I'll re-spin my patch accordingly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>