|
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:36:21AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >[ CCing Herbet Xu ]
> >
> >>>>This is a first attempt at allowing LVS to transmit
> >>>>skbs of greater than MTU length that have been aggregated by GRO.
> >>>>
> >>>>I have lightly tested the ip_vs_dr_xmit() portion of this patch and
> >>>>although it seems to work I am unsure that netif_needs_gso() is the
> >>>>correct
> >>>>test to use.
> >>>
> >>> ip_forward() uses !skb_is_gso(skb), so may be it is
> >>>enough to check for GRO instead of using netif_needs_gso?
> >>
> >>Thanks, I'll look into that.
> >
> >Hi Julian,
> >
> >just to clarify, you think that !skb_is_gso(skb) should be
> >used in ip_vs_xmit.c? If so, yes I think that makes sense
> >and I'll re-spin my patch accordingly.
>
> Yes, I think we should check for !skb_is_gso(skb)
> as it looks as correct check to avoid FRAG_NEEDED after GRO
> but lets wait for confirmation from Herbert Xu.
Yes, lets try and get a word from Herbert Xu on this.
> Also, !skb->local_df check should help for local IPVS clients
> that set local_df.
>
> If you prefer you can create such helper in ip_vs_xmit.c:
>
> /* Check if packet exceeds MTU */
> static inline int ip_vs_mtu_exceeded(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu)
> {
> return skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb) && !skb->local_df;
> }
Good thinking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
