LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: load balanced http servers

To: tc lewis <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: load balanced http servers
Cc: J Saunders <jsaunders@xxxxxxxxx>, Gabriel Neagoe <Gabriel.Neagoe@xxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 16:35:33 -0400 (EDT)
right on brudda.

-wesley

> 
> doesn't coda require authentication from each uid trying to access the
> shared directory structure?  that could pose a problem to webservers with
> hundreds or thousands of sites that utilize cgi scripts via suexec and
> other things that run as varying uids as opposed to 1 uid (the webserver
> itself).  maybe i'm wrong on that, however.  =)
> 
> comments?
> 
> -tcl.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, J Saunders wrote:
> 
> > Gabriel Neagoe wrote:
> > > 
> > > hello
> > > i think that using NFS is not fault tolerant (if the nfs server breaks you
> > > have a biiiiiiig problem)
> > > IMHO using CODA fs would be a better idea
> > 
> > What if the information was being built from a database, and could be
> > rebuilt from the database? The database would use RAID for fault
> > tolerance. My idea was to avoid querying the database all the time and
> > having to format the pages on-the-fly. This way, information is at most
> > one minute out of date, but avoids overloading the SQL server and
> > slowing up response times.
> > 
> > Would CODA have a significant speed advantage if the NFS (or NetBlock
> > Device) server and web servers are on a local 100BaseTX network, and the
> > webservers are connected to the internet via a 2Mbit line?
> > 
> > I can see that CODA would reduce local network traffic and would enable
> > continued serving of pages if the server went down. However, as far as
> > performance goes, does it have anything over Net Block Device?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Jason
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 


http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------
Y2K.  We're all gonna die.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>