|
Same thing here I got 3 virtual server using LVS NAT (WLC algorythm)and I
found it very stable at this time. But the real test will be when we gonna
redirect the 2Go of dynamyc PHP3 on those servers.
By the way I have beginning writing a daemon that can monitor real server (a
bit like ldirectord+heartbeat but into a single module). My perl daemon is
going to directly read "Joseph Mack " .conf for is configure script and
ajust ipvsadm rules (if server are down or up). When I will have something
stable I will show you.
Keep your excellent work guys LVS is powerfull!
(Sorry for my english).
PS Any LVS guys at Montreal linux expo?
emman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Hansen" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Jerry Glomph Black" <black@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Drew Streib" <ds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<tcl@xxxxxxxxx>; <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: LVS testimonials
>
> Thanks for much for this. This actually means a lot coming from someone
> at real networks, not to discredit anyone else, but for my case, it means
> more coming from an non Linux specific company.
>
> Thanks
> -jeremy
>
> > We ran a very simple LVS-DR arrangement with one PII-400 (2.2.14
kernel)directing
> > about 20,000 HTTP requests/second to a bank of about 20 Web servers
answering
> > with tiny identical dummy responses for a few minutes. Worked just
fine.
> >
> >
> > Now, at more terrestrial, but quite high real-world loads, the systems
run just
> > fine, for months on end. (using the weighted-least-connection
algorithm,
> > usually).
> >
> > We tried virtually all of the commercial load balancers, LVS beats them
> > all for reliability, cost, manageability, you-name-it.
> >
> >
> > Jerry Glomph Black
> > Director, Internet & Technical Operations
> > RealNetworks
> > Seattle Washington USA
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Drew Streib wrote:
> >
> > > > The 50,000 figure is unsubstantiated and was _not_ claimed by anyone
at VA
> > > > Linux Systems. A cluster with 16 apache servers and 2 LVS servers in
a was
> > > > configured for Linux World New York but due to interconnect problems
the
> > > > performance was never measured - we weren't happy with the
throughput of the
> > > > NICs so there didn't seem to be a lot of point. This problem has
been
> > > > resolved and there should be an opportunity to test this again soon.
> > >
> > > In recent tests, I've taken multinode clusters to tens of thousands of
> > > connections per second. Sorry for any confusion here. The exact 50,000
> > > number from LWCE NY is unsubstantiated.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>
>
|
