LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: mysql through lvs?

To: Sean Ward <SeanWard@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mysql through lvs?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 13:42:26 -0400
Sean Ward wrote:
> 
> Actually, I ran into the same problem (ie, load balancing and scaling mysql)
> recently. 

the parallel database application was the thing that attracted me to LVS a year
ago.

> The way that I solved this is I wrote a sql dispatch daemon, which
> can execute a sql statement concurrently on several backend systems. Then, I
> rewrote my app so that it seperated reads from writes. Basically, what my
> program now does is track a set of open connections to mysql servers, and
> how many requests are pending on each, and when a new request comes in, it
> choses the least weighted connection, and processes all the reads along
> that. Any writes which are required (I have a high read/write ratio) are
> written to a file, which is then picked up by the dispatch daemon, and
> executed in parallel across the server. The dispatch daemon also has the
> advantages that because it records a global log of changes, I can bring a
> new server into sync my snapshotting another server's DB files, and then
> replaying the log from the time of the snapshot. 

neat. My thinking stopped when I had to deal with a server that died. I like
this.

> If that kind of arrangement
> is of any help to you, check out lsdproject.sourceforge.net where I've stuck
> up the source for the dispatch deamon. 

you have no bugs at all :-) what a project.

I couldn't get to www.geocrawler.com for the mailing lists - it just timed out.

> I'll probably have the read only
> connection balancer up there too in a few days, depending on interest. 

interested. I just enrolled for a sourceforge account and would like to join
the lsd if that's OK with you guys (nice project name). (I saw 2 developer 
names on the lsd list, neither of them looked like yours).


> The
> problem I found with using LVS for load balancing was the need to create a
> new connection for each request (a slow operation) to get the new connection
> load balanced. Its faster to have a pool of open connections and balance
> between them in user land.

yes. you have a plan for this?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>