|
Hello,
On Thu, 4 May 2000, DongHyun Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using lvs-0.9.12 with kernel-2.2.14 + Intel's E100 NIC driver.
> (LVS settings are DirectoRouting+RoundRobin)
> I made benchmark it with "http_load" which generates Web-Requests.
>
> When I tested it with eepro100.o NIC module, LVS showed a good performance.
> But With Intel E100 driver, It showed so many error messages on
> both director(dispather) and real-servers
You probably have problems with the eth drivers. Can you
try with another NIC or with 2.2.15? There are many changes after
2.2.14 in eepro100.c!
If you use ipvs-0.9.12-2.2.14.tar.gz with 2.2.15 there is
one rejection which is not fatal.
>
> error messages are
> eth0: Transmit timed out: status 0050 0000 at 1475/1489 command 000ca000
> eth0: Trying to restart Transmitter...
> eth0: Transmit timed out: status 0050 0000 at 1545/1559 command 000ca000
> eth0: Trying to restart Transmitter...
> eth0: Transmit timed out: status 0050 0000 at 1651/1665 command 000ca000
> eth0: Trying to restart Transmitter...
> eth0: Transmit timed out: status 0050 0000 at 1693/1707 command 000ca000
> eth0: Trying to restart Transmitter...
> ....
>
> and "http_load" clients that send web-request has zero-size reply
> or time out
> (maybe don't get reply)
>
> What's the solution to this problem?
2.2.15! Try many variants. There is a software problem. There are
very little changes in LVS after 0.9.11.
> Do I set my machine incorrectly?
I don't see your settings but the problem can't be raised
from bad settings :)
>
> PS) When I tested it with LVS-0.9.11, there is no problem. :-(
With the Intel E100 driver or with the 2.2.14 driver?
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
