|
On Sun, 14 May 2000, jamal wrote:
> > In neither case is LVS limiting.
>
> Hmmm... Thats definetely an overstatement and misleading.
what's the correct statement and what part is misleading?
> Overhead of the LVS code is definetly a contributor.
how much and what are the units of definitely?
Has anyone done
> profiling on the LVS code?
I have not been able to detect the added latency on network throughput
using LVS VS-DR on a 100Mbps network when I could easily detect 0.3msec.
What are your results?
> To store the tables for thousands of connections means using up relatively
> more RAM.
> So yes, LVS code has everything to do with it.
you just used an example where memory is limiting to conclude that LVS
is limiting
Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
