LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: telnet as easy as http?

To: Michael McConnell <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: telnet as easy as http?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:50:19 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Michael McConnell wrote:

> success )-: hehe
          ^^^

are you from the southern hemisphere too (-: ?

> Is it more difficult to setup LVS to do HTTP, than it is to setup telnet?

http is the 2nd easiest, after telnet. Since you are starting out, grab my
configure script (on the documentation page) and set it up for telnet,
and when that works then try http

 > 
> What happens is I see this
> 
> IP Virtual Server serion 0.9.15 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>     -> RemoteAddress:Port     Forward Wight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP yoggy.vocalcommerce.com:www wlc
>      -> 192.168.10.101:www     Route 1    0   1

you probably have the default gw of the real-server wrong. For VS-DR it
should not be the director, and for a test setup can be the client.

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>