LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ...

from [Joseph Mack] [Permanent Link]
To: Ratz <ratz@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ...
Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:34:45 -0400 (EDT) 
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Ratz wrote:

> I'suggest not to send the updates via UDP but rather
> define a own easy protocoll and run it over the 
> parallel port, since this needs no IP-stack 
> processing and will also work if there is a stack
> problem. 

Parallel port only works for 2 machines. I know you don't want to rely on
IP when IP could be hosed, but Ted elects a director from a set of peers.

It would be nice to do this on a medium like (ethernet) which is
many-to-many.

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Ratz
Next by Date:  Re: is it possible that struct ip_vs_service *svc is not filled up?, Julian Anastasov
Previous by Thread:  ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Ratz
Next by Thread:  Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Wayne
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]