Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ...

[Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Wayne wrote:

> >Parallel port only works for 2 machines. I know you don't want to rely on
> >IP when IP could be hosed, but Ted elects a director from a set of peers.
> >
> >It would be nice to do this on a medium like (ethernet) which is
> >many-to-many.
> 
> Sorry for throwing my 2 cents out, but I think LVS box could never
> be the bottle neck for 99.999% situations.  If we are thinking balancing
> on the wide area networks, that would be totally different. 

I'm looking for a solution where any of "n" machines can become the
director, where n>2.

Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx