LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ...

To: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ...
Cc: Ratz <ratz@xxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 10:08:40 -0700
At 12:58 PM 8/7/00 -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Wayne wrote:
>
>> >I'm looking for a solution where any of "n" machines can become the
>> >director, where n>2.
>> 
>
>> How about have n ethernet cards in one machine, could that serve
>> the same purpose?
>
>sure (if n >3 you might run out of PCI slots) 
>
>Since you'd like all machines to be similar/identical you could have
>a dual NIC in each machine (do dual NICs have 2 MAC addresses?) or 2 NICs
>and a separate network.
>
>Still if the IP layer is hosed you're in trouble.

Agree that if IP layer hosed, we will be in trouble.  Intel making a PCI
ethernet card has four 10/100 port on one PCI card.  I like the idea
to have more eithernet port in one LVS box, that will make it more
look like the Alteon or Fundry's products. 


>Joe
>
>--
>Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>