LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: NFS Redudancy

To: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jeremy Hansen)
Subject: Re: NFS Redudancy
Cc: mack@xxxxxxxxxxx (Joseph Mack), menger@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Matthew Enger), lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ha@xxxxxx
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:27:39 +0100 (BST)
> client machine in a failover situation.  If my primary nfs server dies,
> and my secondary takes over the first, can nfs clients handle this?  
> Something tells me nfs wouldn't be very happy in this situation.

IFF your NFS servers are running some kind of duplexing protocol and handling
write commits to both disk sets before acking them then the protocl is good
enough - for any sane performance you would want NFSv3

The implementations are another matter



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>