lvs-users
|
To: | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jeremy Hansen) |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: NFS Redudancy |
Cc: | mack@xxxxxxxxxxx (Joseph Mack), menger@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Matthew Enger), lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ha@xxxxxx |
From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:27:39 +0100 (BST) |
> client machine in a failover situation. If my primary nfs server dies, > and my secondary takes over the first, can nfs clients handle this? > Something tells me nfs wouldn't be very happy in this situation. IFF your NFS servers are running some kind of duplexing protocol and handling write commits to both disk sets before acking them then the protocl is good enough - for any sane performance you would want NFSv3 The implementations are another matter |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: NFS Redudancy, Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: NFS Redudancy, Wayne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: NFS Redudancy, Jeremy Hansen |
Next by Thread: | Re: NFS Redudancy, Wayne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |