LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: It looks good, it smells good, but...

To: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: It looks good, it smells good, but...
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: David Rodrigues <drodrig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
Yes, but it will have to wait, as the servers are used for other things
(SMTP, etc.) as well. Thanks for your help.

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Joseph Mack wrote:

> David Rodrigues wrote:
> > 
> > Unfortunately, no. I'm running a kernel built from the bastardized sources
> > from Cobalt. This is mandatory if you want to run some of the other
> > Cobalt software on the box. I think that cobalt supplies a special
> > module or two that only their versions of the kernel offer. This may be a
> > problem. Still, the LVS patch ran without error and make config allowed me
> > to set all applicable options.
> 
> hard to tell what's going on then. Can you compile a standard kernel
> and for the moment forgo all those special things that only Cobalt offers?
> 
> Joe
> 
> -- 
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>