LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Route through rather than connect to possible?

To: Kyle Sparger <ksparger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Route through rather than connect to possible?
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:23:48 -0400
Kyle Sparger wrote:
> 
> > the client sends a connect request to the VIP:port on the director which
> > is forwarded to the real-server, where the connect request is accepted.



> In the case I was describing, the director would in fact be a gateway.
> The upstream router would send the packet to the appropriate VIP, through
> the director.  The director would intercept it enroute, and rewrite the
> frame/header and then push it back to one of the real servers.

Let's see if I've got it.

You've a pair of VS-DR directors with a bunch of real-servers 
listening on the VIP behind it. Traffic is routed by 
bgp/gated or whatever to the up director. 

How is that different to the current VS-DR?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>