In my last email, I said, "it will be considered to be dead, and the known
route to the IP address through that peer will be withdrawn."
I should clarify that with BGP, once a route is withdrawn, the next best
path to the destination is selected. In our scenario, there's another
known path to the destination -- through the secondary director -- and so
that path will be the next chosen path.
> rewriting is slow and CPU intensive for the director. However you're
> only rewriting in one direction unlike VS-NAT. However this may not be a
> problem if there are other advantages.
True. But, if you only rewrite the MAC address -- which you could get
away with -- this should end up being not much more expensive than the
current DR method.
Kyle Sparger - Senior System Administrator
Dialtone Internet - Extremely Fast Web Systems
(954) 581-0097 - Voice (954) 581-7629 - Fax
ksparger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dialtoneinternet.net
|