Re: More on scheduling...

[Benjamin Lee <benjaminlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:43:55AM +0000, Julian Anastasov wrote:
 
>       Yes but LVS uses different connection table optimized for
> the client addresses.

Ah, I see. 

>       The LVS forwarding methods are same in 2.2 and 2.4. LVS uses
> only the Netfilter framework, i.e. the hooks but nothing from the
> connection tracking. Currently, you can't run LVS with ip_conntrack.o
> but this is still possible with ipchains.o!

Would there be any advantages to using the ip_conntrack.o vs. the current 
"connection table optimized for clients"?

Cheers,
Ben.