Re: Problem with RR scheduling method?

["Lorn Kay" <lorn_kay@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I guess I should have said that I can force a connection to either server by 
simply removing the other one from the ipvsadm hashed routing table.
My ipchains is very big and ugly, I've tried to just pull out this relevant 
part:
Chain input (policy DENY):
target     prot opt     source                destination           ports

<snip>
-          tcp  ------  0.0.0.0/0            200.100.100.31          * ->   
80
-          tcp  ------  0.0.0.0/0            200.100.100.31          * ->   
443
ACCEPT     tcp  ------  0.0.0.0/0            200.100.100.31        1024:6553 
 ->   80
ACCEPT     tcp  ------  0.0.0.0/0            200.100.100.31          
1024:65535 ->   443
<snip>

(Where "200.100.100.31" would be the VIP I'm using for the FWMARK 3). (This 
isn't really my VIP).
The routing table for the director would look like this

Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use 
Iface
0.0.0.0         200.100.100.1    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 
eth1

--K

> From: Thomas Proell <Thomas.Proell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Lorn Kay <lorn_kay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Problem with RR scheduling method?
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:49:31 +0100 (MET)
>
>
>
> > Making two connections from two different client IPs (after just 
> reseting
> > ipvs with "ipvsadm -C") gives the same (HTTP) server.
>
> Just "ipvsadm -C"? Then you don't have any service at all...
>
> > ipvsadm -L -n confirms this:
>
> O.K. so you seem to have a service running. Show me your "ipchains -L"
> and tell me what "deault gateways" you have.
>
>
>
> Thomas
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.