|
Hi Wenzhuo,
> I suppose it should be:
>
> route delete <VIP's network> mask <VIP's netmask>
Makes definitely more sense ;) Joe, could you change this
please? Anyway it is not needed since it works without
deleting this route. The few NT systems I had to setup, I
never deleted this route.
> > This will make the packets destined for this network will
> > go through the other network interface, not this MS Loopback
> > interface.
> >
> > As I remember, setting its netmask to 255.0.0.0 also works.
> >
> It works, but hosts inside the VIP's subnet will not be able to
> connect to the real server. If you've got any host inside the vip's
> subnet (not matter how small it is), you'll have to delete its subnet
> route.
Are you sure? Maybe I missunderstood you statement or NT's routing
table parsing or I simply cannot follow you. As far as I tested it
(although mostly with different Unices) I had no problem connecting
to the realserver within the netmask of the VIP. However you cannot
connect to the VIP within the cluster but this is a different cup
of beer.
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`
|
