Re: LVS-NAT

["zhangxch" <again.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Have you ever check your real server's seting ? you may consider alias lo or dummy interface to your vip.

----- Original Message -----

From: Robert Carroll

To: 'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'

Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 2:33 AM

Subject: RE: LVS-NAT

Follow up:

 

IP Virtual Server version 1.0.2 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
  -> RemoteAddress:Port          Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP  lvs:www wlc
  -> rlsun02:www                 Masq    1      0          4        
  -> rlsun01:www                 Masq    1      0          4        
TCP  lvs:telnet rr persistent 600
  -> rlsun02:telnet              Masq    1      0          0        
  -> rlsun01:telnet              Masq    1      0          0        

 

it seems to be working.. but I get no reponse in my web browser...

hmm.. any suggestions?

 

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Carroll
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 1:27 PM
To: ''Lvs-Users (E-mail)'
Subject: LVS-NAT

Stupid question maybe.. using lvs_nat.. does the director have to be on two different network segments, or can it be the same?

 

for example

    director IP: 192.168.168.126

    VIP: 192.168.168.200

    real1: 192.168.168.121

    real2: 192.168.168.125

 

I know this may look dumb.. but just wonder if it would work?

 

Questionable,

Robert Carroll