|
the real server need the vip lvs's internal vip as their default gw. Have any
one try it work on the same segment ? you may considering use DR mode, it's
easy and more efficient.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Carroll" <RCarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 2:39 AM
Subject: RE: LVS-NAT
> well I figured that..
>
> I trying to get this to work with out talking to the network admin.
> They already have NAT working in front of this setup. I had LVS_DR working
> but it would not work outside the local network. Without stepping on toes I
> figure I try the LVS_Nat solution.
>
> Long story short, I cant change the VIP or it wont go thru the other NAT.
> At least thats what I think its doing.
>
> Confused,
> Rob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thornton Prime [mailto:thornton@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 1:33 PM
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: LVS-NAT
>
>
> > Robert Carroll wrote:
> >
> > Stupid question maybe.. using lvs_nat.. does the director have to be
> > on two different network segments, or can it be the same?
> >
> > for example
> > director IP: 192.168.168.126
> > VIP: 192.168.168.200
> > real1: 192.168.168.121
> > real2: 192.168.168.125
> >
> > I know this may look dumb.. but just wonder if it would work?
>
> I think it would probably work, but as far as I can see you would be
> taking on all the disadvantages of NAT and eliminating most of its
> advantages.
>
> thornton
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
