Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello Joe,
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
>
> > > The current LVS versions don't consider the
> > > service and all packets CIPNET -> VIP
> >
> > but there is no VIP here, I'm using fwmark only.
> > what does the -M 255.255.255.0 do in this case?
>
> The current LVS versions assume the VIP is the iphdr->daddr,
> i.e. the destination address in the datagram and this addresses is
> used to lookup/create the template.
how about your persistent-patch, which I've been working with?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|