LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: network granularity with persistent fwmark

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: network granularity with persistent fwmark
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:17:36 -0400
Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
>         Hello Joe,
> 
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
> 
> > > The current LVS versions don't consider the
> > > service and all packets CIPNET -> VIP
> >
> > but there is no VIP here, I'm using fwmark only.
> > what does the -M 255.255.255.0 do in this case?
> 
>         The current LVS versions assume the VIP is the iphdr->daddr,
> i.e. the destination address in the datagram and this addresses is
> used to lookup/create the template.

how about your persistent-patch, which I've been working with?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>