Re: network granularity with persistent fwmark

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello Joe,

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:

> > The current LVS versions don't consider the
> > service and all packets CIPNET -> VIP
>
> but there is no VIP here, I'm using fwmark only.
> what does the -M 255.255.255.0 do in this case?

        The current LVS versions assume the VIP is the iphdr->daddr,
i.e. the destination address in the datagram and this addresses is
used to lookup/create the template.


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>