LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working

To: "Andreas J. Koenig" <andreas.koenig@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working
Cc: Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 16:09:32 +0300 (EEST)
        Hello,

On 2 May 2001, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:

> That's fine. Performance second. 'KeepAliveTimeout 15' is *not
> incorrect*. If you have 5 servers with 15 secs KeepAliveTimeout, then
> you can serve
>
>     60*60*24*5/15 = 28800 requests per day

        This is not true. I don't have this limit of 1 req/15 secs

        KeepAlive Off can be useful for banner serving but a short
KeepAlive period has its advantages in some cases with long rtt where
the connection setups costs time and because the modern browsers are
limited to the number of connections they open. Of course, the default
period can be reduced but its value depends on the served content,
whether the client is expected to open many connections for short
period or just one.

> plus all those that actually use KeepAlive. Which is enough
> for most people. As we are on a mailing list where performance
> matters, this is less likely the case.
>
> --
> andreas


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>