![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working |
| From: | Alois Treindl <alois@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 May 2001 15:22:30 +0200 (METDST) |
> On 2 May 2001, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > > That's fine. Performance second. 'KeepAliveTimeout 15' is *not > > incorrect*. If you have 5 servers with 15 secs KeepAliveTimeout, then > > you can serve > > > > 60*60*24*5/15 = 28800 requests per day I think a factor of 64'000 is forgotten here (number of possible reply ports), plus the fact that most http connections do seem to terminate immediately, despite the KeepAlive. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |