Re: LVS-NAT - Review request

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Brent Cook wrote:

> Hi,
>
>   This looks a lot better than editing kernel code. According to the
> manpage, a timeout value of 0 means that the current value is preserved.
> When I try this with ipvsadm v1.19 2001/08/27 and IPVS v0.9.3, it reports
> illegal timeout values. Is this correct?

        No, it is not correct. You have to send a bug report directly
to the author. 0 is a valid value, as you said.

> e.g.
> root@ooga:~# ipvsadm --set 2400 0 0
> illegal timeout values
>
> Thanks,
>  Brent


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>