LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-NAT - Review request

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT - Review request
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Brent Cook <busterb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:24:12 -0500 (CDT)
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>       Hello,
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Brent Cook wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >   This looks a lot better than editing kernel code. According to the
> > manpage, a timeout value of 0 means that the current value is preserved.
> > When I try this with ipvsadm v1.19 2001/08/27 and IPVS v0.9.3, it reports
> > illegal timeout values. Is this correct?
>
>       No, it is not correct. You have to send a bug report directly
> to the author. 0 is a valid value, as you said.

Done! I sent a patch to the authors, and a believe that something similar
to it, at least in spirit, will appear in the next release of ipvsadm.
The same error checking used to check persistence timeouts was being
used to check the ip timeouts. Thanks for the reminder.

 - Brent

> > root@ooga:~# ipvsadm --set 2400 0 0
> > illegal timeout values
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  Brent
>
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>