RE: [LVS - NAT] alternatives

["Don Hinshaw" <dwh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

> one more point I'd like to mention... I have been bit by a few etherexpress
> pro / linux network driver issues in the past when there is sustained high
> traffic load.  Things like _that_ make me shy away from architectures like
> NAT.

Was that with Intel's drivers or these by Don Becker et al? 

eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker 
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html

eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.10 $ 2000/05/31 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin 
<saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others

eepro100.c: VA Linux custom, Dragan Stancevic <visitor@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2000/11/15


-=dwh=-

________________________________________________________________
http://www.OpenRecording.com For musicians by musicians.
Now with free Web-Based email too!