|
scyld drivers. I updated to a newer rev and that fixed the problem(s)...
well.. most of them. I haven't tested out the new intel drivers yet, mostly
because I don't have 2.4.x and my current version works decently.
anyway I'm still suspicious enough to try to avoid high loads..
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Hinshaw
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 9/11/01 1:29 AM
Subject: RE: [LVS - NAT] alternatives
Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> one more point I'd like to mention... I have been bit by a few
etherexpress
> pro / linux network driver issues in the past when there is sustained
high
> traffic load. Things like _that_ make me shy away from architectures
like
> NAT.
Was that with Intel's drivers or these by Don Becker et al?
eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html
eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.10 $ 2000/05/31 Modified by Andrey V.
Savochkin
<saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others
eepro100.c: VA Linux custom, Dragan Stancevic <visitor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
2000/11/15
-=dwh=-
________________________________________________________________
http://www.OpenRecording.com For musicians by musicians.
Now with free Web-Based email too!
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
