|
I am sorry, I did not state clearly. The real servers are
3 Apache, but the spec I talked about is the LVS box.
At 06:47 PM 11/1/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Wayne-
> I am assuming that you're testing RS running Apache. I'd be curious as
>to what your Apache set up is, i.e. how many servers started, how many
>children, how many requests, etc. etc.. I have been playing around with
>my RS's (dual PII500's with 512MB) and regardless of what I do with
>Apaches settings (within reason, I am not limiting it one server) I
>can't really see the settings making any difference.
>
>Z
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Wayne
>> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:26 PM
>> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: NAT Performance and what is a good bench mark?
>>
>>
>> Depends on what kind of real server you have, it could take
>> half the world to get them fully exhausted. I run a test on
>> a box with 500 new connection per second, total 50,000
>> connection on it, it only used about 25MB memory out of
>> 128MB, and CPU usage is about 8% of a Celeron 600MHz.
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
