|
>Does LVS-DR work fine from the gateway/firewall as well, or only from the
>clients _behind_ it? If so, what does 'route -n' give?
Yes: no problems at all getting to the LVS server from here (my office) to
there (my remote data center) and it properly uses round-robin scheduling.
> If so, what does 'route -n' give
On the director:
[root@ns root]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
10.80.1.20 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0
10.80.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 10.80.1.3 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
On the realserver(s):
[root@prod-zope-atl01 root]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
0.0.0.0 10.80.1.3 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0
eth0
10.80.1.20 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 lo
10.80.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
[root@prod-zope-atl02 root]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
0.0.0.0 10.80.1.3 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0
eth0
10.80.1.20 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 lo
10.80.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
Matt Gregory
Web Developer
CTI, Inc.
cell: 678-458-6513
ioem: matt.gregory@xxxxxxxxx *see key block below
ooem: matthew.gregory@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|---------+-------------------------------------->
| | Martijn Klingens |
| | <mklingens@xxxxxx> |
| | Sent by: |
| | lvs-users-admin@LinuxVirtua|
| | lServer.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 08/30/2002 03:26 AM |
| | Please respond to lvs-users|
| | |
|---------+-------------------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Problems with routing from realservers using LVS_DR
|
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On Friday 30 August 2002 02:54, Matt.Gregory@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Sorry It has taken me so long to respond to this, but I just wanted to be
> sure...
>
> Even if I manually insert a default route into the realserver, or a 0
route
> (0.0.0.0 -> same as default) I still am unable to directly contact the
> realservers from the firewall/gateway. Also, from the realservers I am
> unable to ping servers outside of my internal network. LVS-DR works just
> fine.
Does LVS-DR work fine from the gateway/firewall as well, or only from the
clients _behind_ it? If so, what does 'route -n' give?
--
Martijn
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely
for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or
its attachments, hyperlinks, or any other files of any kind is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
the sender immediately by telephone (865-218-2000) or by a reply to this
electronic mail message and delete this message and all copies and
backups thereof.
|
