|
Hi Joe,
thanks realy much for your help,
i'd like to say thanks directly to you, appart from my boss i
appreciate specially to the lvs team for what they are doing and
i prefer not only to get things from others.
If there is anything what i could do for lvs, lets say translate docs
from english to german or so then please let me konw, i'm not
sure if M$ skripts/apps dealing with lvs via telnet would help
open source, but if then i'd appreciate ...
chears
Matthias
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Mack [mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Dienstag, 10. September 2002 20:28
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; MKrauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Failover with a high persistent timeout
Matthias Krauss wrote:
>
> Doing ipvsadm -C clears most of the entries but RIP1 still shows up
> with "state NONE" and its high expire time even if the host was removed.
changing the weights or doing ipvsadm -C only sets ipvsadm for new
connections.
If you have any connections open to RIP1, they will keep the old timeout
values.
If the old timeout value is being maintained and you have no connections,
then other people here will have to help you.
Persistence is not well suited to connections requiring long timeouts
because
of the amount of memory you'll need. It's better
to rewrite your application.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
