lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Director Redundacy options? VRRP, heartbeat, ldirectord? |
From: | Sean Knox <sean.knox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:39:41 -0700 |
Hello all,I have been evaluating the various failover options as of late- I wanted to get other's opinions and the pros/cons of using one solution over another...namely, VRRP, heartbeat, and ldirectord. Currently we use heartbeat in production, and it works well. I'm curious to how well each of these will scale, and of course, the stability of each option. Any and all insight is appreciated- thanks! Sean |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LVS with a few LinuxDirector, Peter Mueller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | lvs-NAT ftp (Kernel 2.4.19), Tim Cronin |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LVS with a few LinuxDirector, Peter Mueller |
Next by Thread: | Re: Director Redundacy options? VRRP, heartbeat, ldirectord?, Matthew S. Crocker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |