|
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Sean Knox wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have been evaluating the various failover options as of late- I
> wanted to get other's opinions and the pros/cons of using one solution
> over another...namely, VRRP, heartbeat, and ldirectord. Currently we use
> heartbeat in production, and it works well. I'm curious to how well each
> of these will scale, and of course, the stability of each option. Any
> and all insight is appreciated- thanks!
I used to use heartbeat with a serial cable between my two directors. I
have since rebuilt them and switched to keepalived/VRRP. The both work, I
think I like keepalived/VRRP better. I haven't had any stabilities
problems with either software package. When I was rebuiling my LVS
directors I didn't think hearbeat was still being developed and keepalived
is still actively developed.
-Matt
> > Sean
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew S. Crocker
Vice President / Internet Division Email: matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx
Crocker Communications Phone: (413) 746-2760
PO BOX 710 Fax: (413) 746-3704
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710 http://www.crocker.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
