lvs-users
|
To: | "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Problem with LVS DR - 10065 Host is unreachable |
From: | "Rogers, Paul" <Paul.Rogers@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:44:53 -0000 |
Sébastien The set up of the ip addresses on the realservers seems very strange. Can you confirm what the submask should be, based on the following. All servers/clients on the network use a mask of 255.255.248.0 ie RIP1 = 10.80.18.44 with 255.255.248.0 Therefore should the mask for 10.80.18.203 on the lo:203 interface be 255.255.248.0 or 255.255.255.0? How about the mask for 10.80.18.203 on the eth0:203 interface? On the basis that there is no DNS, only the host files, what entries should be in the hosts tables on the director - VIP, DIP or both? Both RIP's? How about the real servers? VIP, DIP or both? I tried pinging the real servers from another linux box and no reply, so it appears that the Windows clients can see them but not the linux boxes. I suspect this is because the windows clients use WINS to resolve the names while the linux boxes can't. I have run tcpdump as you suggested. How's the best way to get them to you. Copy and paste into the e mail or include them in the mail as files. In either event shall I remove anything that doesn't mention either the director or the realservers? Again, thanks for your time and effort. Paul
|
Previous by Date: | Re: How does LVS check server availability?, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Problem with LVS DR - 10065 Host is unreachable, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Problem with LVS DR - 10065 Host is unreachable, Sébastien Bonnet |
Next by Thread: | Re: Problem with LVS DR - 10065 Host is unreachable, Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |