lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx, keepalived-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Problem implementing LVS + Keepalived |
From: | Alexandra Alvarado <aaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:51:04 -0500 |
I need to implement in my work Load Balancing, well I have trying to use LVS +keepalived and I do the next: Until now I have two directories working as active - failover and I don't have problem with this, I wrote a simple script to work with remote transparent proxies and it works ok [I'm using the information of executing the command "ipvsadm -L -n | grep Route"], BUT I can't to balance real servers. In this case I want to balance two proxies that are listen on port 8080, when I configure the VIP in the browser of clients machines, the conections appears only as InActConn, I can't get any connection to pass to ActiveConn state, like this: [root@lvs-dr1 keepalived]# ipvsadm -L -n IP Virtual Server version 1.0.4 (size=65536) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP 208.61.69.179:8080 rr persistent 50 -> 208.61.69.185:8080 Route 1 0 3 -> 208.61.69.184:8080 Route 1 0 1 I have the next: On Directory IP eth0= 208.61.69.3 VIP eth0 = 28.61.69.2 IP eth1= 208.61.69.177 VIP eth1= 208.61.69.179 VIP eth1= 208.61.68.1 and others GW= 208.61.69.1 [Fast Ethernet 0/0 of cisco] echo 1 > ip_forwarding [root@lvs-dr1 keepalived]# uname -a Linux lvs-dr1.telconet.net 2.4.18-14 #1 Wed Sep 4 13:35:50 EDT 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@lvs-dr1 keepalived]# ipvsadm -h | head -1 ipvsadm v1.21 2002/07/09 (compiled with popt and IPVS v1.0.4) [root@lvs-dr1 keepalived]# ipvsadm -L -n | head -1 IP Virtual Server version 1.0.4 (size=65536) I'm running keepalived version keepalived-0.7.1 The architecture is in the attachment, all routes from the internet arrives to cisco and after are routed to the ip 208.61.69.2 [eth0 of lvs-dr1], I have this IP as VIP, what i want to say is that the directory acts as router because after i divide all nets in too many subnets to the clients, additionally i have running bgp in this machine and I control to clientes with MAC addresses associated to IP addresses, and is a firewall. The config of keepalived is: ! Configuration File for keepalived global_defs { notification_email { aaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx } notification_email_from aaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx smtp_server 127.0.0.1 smtp_connect_timeout 30 lvs_id LVS_KEEP } vrrp_sync_group VG1 { group { VI_1 VI_3 } } vrrp_sync_group VG2 { group { VI_2 VI_4 } } vrrp_instance VI_1 { state MASTER interface eth0 garp_master_delay 10 smtp_alert virtual_router_id 51 priority 200 advert_int 1 authentication { auth_type PASS auth_pass xxxxx } virtual_ipaddress { 208.61.69.2 } } vrrp_instance VI_2 { state BACKUP interface eth0 smtp_alert virtual_router_id 50 priority 150 advert_int 1 virtual_ipaddress { 208.61.69.5 } } vrrp_instance VI_3 { state MASTER interface eth1 smtp_alert virtual_router_id 52 priority 200 advert_int 1 authentication { auth_type PASS auth_pass xxxxx } virtual_ipaddress { 208.61.68.1 208.81.88.1 208.61.71.65 208.81.91.241 208.81.91.253 208.81.91.245 208.81.83.177 208.61.69.179 } } vrrp_instance VI_4 { state BACKUP interface eth1 smtp_alert virtual_router_id 53 priority 150 advert_int 1 virtual_ipaddress { 208.144.191.1 207.87.93.1 172.16.1.1 206.29.206.61 207.100.133.5 } } virtual_server 208.61.69.179 8080 { delay_loop 6 lb_algo rr lb_kind DR persistence_timeout 50 protocol TCP real_server 208.61.69.184 8080 { weight 1 TCP_CHECK { connect_timeout 3 connect_port 8080 } } real_server 208.61.69.185 8080 { weight 1 TCP_CHECK { connect_timeout 3 connect_port 8080 } } } On Reals Servers IP= 208.61.69.184 GW= 208.61.69.180 echo 1 > ip_forward echo 1 > all/hidden echo 1 > lo/hidden ifconfig lo:0 208.61.69.179 netmask 255.255.255.255 broadcast 208.61.69.179 [root@proxy1 root]# uname -a Linux proxy1.telconet.net 2.4.18 #2 Wed Dec 11 16:18:53 ECT 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I have configured squid On Clients IP= 208.61.68.32 GW=208.61.68.1 In browser i configure as proxy 208.61.69.179 port 8080 Really I need help, i don't know what is wrong. Thanks Alexandra Alvarado PD: The last test I did was to remove the VIP 208.61.69.2 and configure it in other machine, after that the directory begun to balance the load of proxies [I don't know the reason], but I need to keep the current architecture of servers, becuase I don't want to loose the active - failover service that is running now. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | IP Connection tracking and LVS_DR, Andy Levine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: I'm creating a mirror of Julians site; please help, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | IP Connection tracking and LVS_DR, Andy Levine |
Next by Thread: | known problems with bonding/teaming, Steder, Michael |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |