LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer,multiple

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer,multiple clusters?]
From: Björn Metzdorf <bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:02:01 +0200
> The suggestion: would it be possible to add a
> "priority load balancing" weighting option in one of
> the next releases, so that all the requests go to the
> server witht he lowest rating, and if ti becomes
> unavailable, the requests go the next lowest-rated
> server, and so?  I don;t imagine it would be too hard
> to implement?

LVS makes no assumptions about the status of the real server. This is not
LVS' job. What you need is keepalived (http://keepalived.sf.net), it will
take care of what you want (remove broken servers from pool, activate hot
standby, and so on).

Regards,
Bjoern

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>