lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer,multiple clusters?] |
From: | Björn Metzdorf <bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:02:01 +0200 |
> The suggestion: would it be possible to add a > "priority load balancing" weighting option in one of > the next releases, so that all the requests go to the > server witht he lowest rating, and if ti becomes > unavailable, the requests go the next lowest-rated > server, and so? I don;t imagine it would be too hard > to implement? LVS makes no assumptions about the status of the real server. This is not LVS' job. What you need is keepalived (http://keepalived.sf.net), it will take care of what you want (remove broken servers from pool, activate hot standby, and so on). Regards, Bjoern |
Previous by Date: | Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer, multiple clusters?], Alan Murrell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer, multiple clusters?], Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer, multiple clusters?], Alan Murrell |
Next by Thread: | Re: Suggestion for next release? [WAS Re: single load-balancer, multiple clusters?], Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |