LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: lvs NAT state tables

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: lvs NAT state tables
From: Fong Vang <FVang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:24:03 -0700
The '-S' argument isn't supported by iptables.  I believe that's for
ipchains which I've already tried without success.

-----Original Message-----
From: Horms [mailto:horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 8:45 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: lvs NAT state tables


On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:26:17AM -0700, Fong Vang wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Horms [mailto:horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:18 AM
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: Re: lvs NAT state tables
> 
> I've looked at those files.  None of those files have 15 (for 15 minutes)
> nor 900 (900s = 15 minutes).  I've also tried increasing the values in
those
> files.  ipvsadm -Lnc still shows countdown starting at 15 minutes.

In that case it may be a timeout dictated by netfilter.
Try playing with iptables -S. Details are in the iptables man page.

-- 
Horms


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com. 
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>