LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: User base

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: User base
From: "Teresa Harriott" <Teresa_Harriott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:38:40 -0400
These responses are very helpful.  Thanks to everyone that has or is repsonding.

>>> pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx 4/24/2003 3:16:43 PM >>>
> We are considering LVS and would like to get an idea of some 
> of the other companies that are using LVS in production environments.

We have been using LVS here for just about 2 (?) years now with little to no
issues.  Support here is pretty good - between Joe, Horms, Ratz, Julian, and
Wensong you're going to get dizzy ;)

Before LVS I've used F5s and local directors.  Local directors always seemed
to cause issues with spanning-tree & bridging on our switches.  F5's were
solid but not as flexible.  Obviously price is interesting, too.  Free =
good.

If you are looking for high availability check out:
Ultramonkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/ 
Keepalived  - http://www.keepalived.org/ 
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>