LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Real & virtual ip address confusion

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Real & virtual ip address confusion
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
From: John Reuning <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 16 Jun 2003 13:43:03 -0400
I tried removing the original primary ip address from the director and
only use VIPs.  However, the system sees the first ip address attached
to an interface as primary.

So, the first VIP that's enabled by keepalived is the one that sometimes
responds to another VIP's requests.  It doesn't seem to matter how it's
added.

Thanks,

-jrr

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 13:23, Joseph Mack wrote:
>  
> > The problem occurs when http replies from the director are sent from the
> > primary external ip address 152.2.210.38 instead of from the VIP.
> 
> this is not supposed to happen. 
> 
> Julian,
>       2 people now have reported in LVS-NAT that the director replies
> from the primary IP and not the VIP. Is this something you know about?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>