lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: IPVSADM on Suse |
From: | "Quinzin Maxime (BULL)" <maxime.quinzin@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:01:45 +0200 |
ipvsadm outputs : linuxzen:~ # ipvsadm -L IP Virtual Server version 1.0.6 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP 172.16.115.10:http wrr -> linux09.frec.bull.fr:http Route 70 0 0 -> linuxdrk.frec.bull.fr:http Route 30 0 0 Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2003-07-22T09:44:09, Maxime Quinzin <maxime.quinzin@xxxxxxxx> said:When I do a load balancing, on SUSE 8.2 with ipvsadm-1.21-214 (provided by SuSe), with same criterias I have to run 1000 http request to see the 70/30 ratio ...I have this sequence 100A 100B 500A 100B 100A 100B The ratio is good, but has the algorithm changed between this 2 versions of ipvsadm ?This hasn't got anything to do with ipvsadm, but the scheduling strategy. The kernel patch is the same, so it shouldn't matter. Please show the output of 'ipvsadm' so we can see what you have... Are you generating the requests in the same manner? Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: IPVSADM on Suse, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: IPVSADM on Suse, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
Previous by Thread: | Re: IPVSADM on Suse, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
Next by Thread: | Re: IPVSADM on Suse, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |