|
John Cronin wrote:
>
> -> for 3/4 the cost. I don't know how important the cost is, but you'd
> -> get better performance with a CPU with some cache on it.
>
> Sorry Joe, not to get argumentative, but I respectfully disagree.
I stand corrected, thanks. I thought the celeron was a regular CPU without
the cache. Did I get this completely wrong or was there such an
animal at some time?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|