![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | jimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21 |
| Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Cc: | netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Cc: | quagga-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Cc: | "Elizabeth Stokely <lizabeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. João Nuno Mendes" <lizabeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| From: | Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:19:35 +0200 |
[Jim Miller]:
>
> Well, I'm in the middle stages of setting up two linux server
> firewalls (iptables/netfilter - doing stateful firewalling) with
> keepalived (vrrp) and the LVS framework kernel patch, in a
> Master/Backup configuration (keepalive seems to like having the
> lvs framework to build on).
what are you using LVS for? sounds like you don't need it.
keepalived runs fine without LVS.
--
Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind
| http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21, Roberto Nibali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Error running keepalived, Kjetil Torgrim Homme |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21, Jim Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21, Joseph Mack |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |