lvs-users
|
To: | jimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21 |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Cc: | netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Cc: | quagga-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Cc: | "Elizabeth Stokely <lizabeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. João Nuno Mendes" <lizabeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:19:35 +0200 |
[Jim Miller]: > > Well, I'm in the middle stages of setting up two linux server > firewalls (iptables/netfilter - doing stateful firewalling) with > keepalived (vrrp) and the LVS framework kernel patch, in a > Master/Backup configuration (keepalive seems to like having the > lvs framework to build on). what are you using LVS for? sounds like you don't need it. keepalived runs fine without LVS. -- Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind | http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21, Roberto Nibali |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Error running keepalived, Kjetil Torgrim Homme |
Previous by Thread: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21, Jim Miller |
Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21, Joseph Mack |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |