Re: FW: Antefacto and 2.4.21

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Jim Miller wrote:

> My use for LVS and the Antefacto patch is with non-NATed ip space (we
> use IPs assiged to us from ARIN).  I _do_ hope the patch will still
> function.

        You rely on antefacto patch for non-NAT? What is the usage?:

- DR/TUN real server uses director as default gateway?

- NEW/EST states for incoming packets?

        BTW, I'm not sure what will happen if tcp-window-tracking.patch
is used for DR/TUN, may be it expects bidirectional streams?

> Jim

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>