LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:03:27 +0900
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:46:28AM -0700, Jon Neher wrote:
> 
> We've been using ultramonkey/heartbeat for a while with one
> director (with a failover director) to load balance some services
> to 2 realservers and it's working great.  We have a situation
> now where we need to only have one realserver (r1) being routed to
> at a time and then have the other realserver (r2) routed to only
> in the case that the services become unavailable on r1.
> 
> Does anyone have any suggestions on how best to configure this?

1.

You can stop using LVS all together and just use HA
as per http://www.ultramonkey.org/2.0.1/topologies/ha-overview.html

2. Use LVS and in the ldirectord.cf file set up the virtual service 
   with one real server r1. Put r2 in as the failback server.

-- 
Horms
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>