lvs-users
|
To: | frederic.buche@xxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: hidding loopback interface does not work properly |
Cc: | LVS Users <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:57:10 +0200 (EET) |
Hello, For now, it works properly. The hidden flag does not prevent replies for unicast probes, save your time, read the docs: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#hidden Make sure you configure the hidden flag before adding the VIP addresses. If you first define the VIPs before setting hidden flags the other hosts can use this gap to cache the entry and now they send unicast probes. And we know that some OSes cache for hours :( Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | is my kernel already patched?, ilclaudio |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: is my kernel already patched?, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Re: hidding loopback interface does not work properly, Horms |
Next by Thread: | [PATCH]add simple unsplicing to tcpsp-0.0.3 with the help of a cookie, yangrunhua |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |