Checkout dnat (destination nat), which I believe kick in rather
early in the filter process, and /should/ allow the lvs stuff to
kick in later on.
/A
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Werner
Schulz
Sent: den 9 december 2003 14:06
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject:
Hello,
I'm using linux kernel-2.6-test11 want to do something like that:
clients ------ gw (lvs-dr+fwmark) ------ server 1,2,3...
|
+----------------- server B
+----------------- server C
:
If server 1,2... sends packets to clients LVS should redirect them to one of
servers B,C...
My problem is, that netfilter on gw correctly marks the packets (seen in the
iptables counter stats) but LVS doesn't route them to server B,C... It only
routes packets if they are marked _and_ addressed to the gw-VIP.
Is there a possibility to achieve my desired operating mode?
Kind regards, Werner
P.S. I can't use NAT/IP-IP-tunnels because I need the loadbalancing and
persistent features from LVS.
P.S.S.Let me know if you need more specs.
P.S.S.S. Please apologize my bad english... :-}
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|